|
Grant & Taylor Military |
|
|
| Taylor and Grant both made due with what
they had on hand or could create in the field, without complaining. In
his Memoirs, Grant wrote that Taylor, whose nickname was “Old Rough
and Ready,” operated “with the means given him.” If he argued for
more resources and didn’t get them, “he would have gone on and done
the best he could,” wrote Grant. Both were willing to take losses in assaults that they believed would ultimately save lives by shortening battles and wars. Both caught political and journalistic flack as a result, but just went on winning. Taylor and Grant were both clearheaded and calm under fire. They both moved freely through their commands to see things for themselves, as Grant biographer Jean Edward Smith observed. |
![]() |
![]() |
Grant also learned much about professionalism and strategy from General Winfield Scott. Scott, however, was too formal, officious, meticulous, and pompous for Grant, who preferred the style and approach of Taylor. Taylor and Grant always remembered that
their battlefield enemies were human beings and recognized the strategic
advantages to treating them as such. Taylor and Grant were both
magnanimous (and politically astute, whether or not they realized it)
military victors. They knew that achieving the objective, not
humiliating a worthy opponent, was the point. Taylor offered generous
surrender terms to the Mexican army at Monterey. Grant remembered.
Almost 20 years later, he offered almost identical terms to Lee’s
defeated Army at Appomattox, wrote Smith. In making those terms, Grant
paid “unspoken tribute to Taylor,” Smith noted. |